Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the ability to revolutionize global healthcare delivery, offering opportunities to accelerate progress toward Sustainable Development Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being. This potential is especially significant in the Global South, where resource constraints, infrastructure limitations, and diverse sociocultural approaches to health and healing create complex, or “wicked,” problems. From clinical decision support systems and diagnostic tools to predictive analytics and drug discovery platforms, AI applications are multifold. However, their rapid deployment raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding their potential to perpetuate harm. Current governance mechanisms often fall short in addressing structural inequities or empowering affected communities. These frameworks typically focus narrowly on risk identification/mitigation and technical fairness, neglecting crucial historical and sociocultural realities. This article introduces Reparative Algorithmic Impact Assessments (R-AIAs) as a transformative framework for ensuring ethical and equitable AI deployment in healthcare. Grounded in decolonial and intersectional values, R-AIAs emphasize challenging Western epistemologies, promoting data inclusivity and sovereignty, fostering participatory governance, and redressing systemic biases, inequities, and power imbalances. The framework's ability to center diverse knowledge systems, such as Ubuntu philosophy, emphasizes its catalytic potential. R-AIAs operationalize these principles through six interconnected steps, exemplified by a case study of an AI-powered maternal health system in sub-Saharan Africa. These steps offer actionable strategies for bridging global divides. By embedding reparative practices, R-AIAs elevate impact assessments from compliance exercises to tools for empowerment, challenging colonial legacies and advancing global health equity. The framework underscores that achieving “AI for All” demands a sustained commitment to justice and redress.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1177/27523543251372031

Type

Journal article

Publisher

SAGE Publishing

Publication Date

2025-09-08T00:00:00+00:00

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic Impact Assessments, Algorithmic Reparations, Global Health Equity, Maternal Health