The NeuroDev Study: Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization of Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Kenya and South Africa.
de Menil V. et al, (2019), Neuron, 101, 15 - 19
Pratt B. et al, (2018), BMC Med Ethics, 19
McCoy MS. et al, (2018), J Med Ethics
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley.
Sheehan M. et al, (2018), J Med Ethics, 44, 719 - 720
Healthcare professionals' understanding of the legislation governing research involving adults lacking mental capacity in England and Wales: a national survey.
Shepherd V. et al, (2018), J Med Ethics, 44, 632 - 637
Lay perspectives on receiving different types of genomic secondary findings: a qualitative vignette study
Vornanen M. et al, (2018), Journal of Genetic Counseling
High-Risk Women’s Risk Perception After Receiving Personalized Polygenic Breast Cancer Risk Information
Forrest L. et al, (2018), Journal of Community Genetics
Ives J. et al, (2018), BMC Med Ethics, 19
"I would like to discuss it further with an expert": a focus group study of Finnish adults' perspectives on genetic secondary findings.
Vornanen M. et al, (2018), J Community Genet, 9, 305 - 314
Between the Reasonable and the Particular: Deflating Autonomy in the Legal Regulation of Informed Consent to Medical Treatment.
Dunn M. et al, (2018), Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy
Lucivero F. and Jongsma KR., (2018), J Med Ethics
Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.
Wright S. et al, (2018), J Genet Couns
Book Review - Social Services Disrupted: Changes, Challenges and Policy Implications for Europe in Times of Austerity
Dunn MC., (2018), Ethics and Social Welfare, 12, 90 - 93
Elbow Room for Best Practice? Montgomery, Patients' values, and Balanced Decision-Making in Person-Centred Clinical Care.
Herring J. et al, (2017), Medical law review, 25, 582 - 603