Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

This seminar has been cancelled and will be rescheduled at a later date

Abstract

In this talk I explore the hypothesis that we are entering, or have entered, an “age of health”. I begin by identifying some suggestive pieces of evidence: the handing-over of social issues to the medical profession (e.g. concerning end of life); the growth of scope of “health” (e.g. to include mental health and planetary health); the increasing power of public health (e.g. lockdowns; health-related taxes); and the growth of health-related academic work, such as this talk. I then try to formulate the hypothesis more precisely. I develop the idea that this is not merely a sociological change, but a conceptual one: health has come to operate as a master-value, incorporating matters that used to be treated as belonging to separate social, legal, political, personal, ethical, or spiritual domains. I contrast this idea with existing work on related themes, such as medicalisation and biopolitics. I go on to consider what the implications are if the hypothesis is true. If we live in an age of health, what does that mean for science, politics, and medicine? Finally, I consider what evidence might tell for or against the hypothesis, or whether it might lead us to a better one.